Given above is a diagram showing the Earth orbiting around the Sun with its 4 positions in a year of completing the orbital cycle. This is what is so far understood by the Scientific World, and taught to all the students around the World. I hereby controvert this thesis on the basis of my logics about conditions of the Earth surface,which we encounter everyday and everywhere.
1- Looking at the diagram, we can easily understand that the Northern and Southern Hemispheres of the Earth get symmetrically placed with respect to the Sun around a year, the duration of the Earth's completion of one orbit. This means that both the hemispheres of the Earth are equally affected by the light and heat from the Sun reaching the Earth in the period of a year, provided that the Sun remains the same all over the year, and that for this study we may presume that the Sun remains stationary at the center of the earth's orbit.
But we have been observing the following facts about the conditions on the Earth surface.
a- Original human populations on the Earth surface are generally White in the Northern Hemisphere, and generally black in the Southern Hemisphere, indicating thereby that amount of heat energy reaching from the sun on the two hemispheres is unequal - more on the Southern Hemisphere and Less on the Northern Hemisphere, affecting skin colors of population on the two hemisheres.
b- There exists a wide difference between the lights reaching on the two polar zones of the Earth - Arctic and Antarctica. Day and Night durations on the two polar zones are also quite different with respect to duration and area on the two polar zones.
c- Geographical conditions on the two polar zones too are quite different from each other, with dry land in Antarctica, and Icy waters in the Arctic zone.
d- Durations of Days and Nights on the Earth surface vary along the longitudes and at different times of the year. These variations are NOT symmetrical in the two hemispheres. In view of the above diagram of the Sun-Earth geometry, these variations must have been symmetrical in the two hemispheres.
2- The spinning axis of the Earth is said to be inclined with respect to the perpendicular to the assumed orbital plane of the Earth's motion is said to be inclined by an angle of about .5 degrees and that remains the same all around the year. No understandable logic for tis inclination is givem by the theorists so far except that ihe Earth maintains its inclination that was at the time of an assumed Big Bang.
3. Two motions of the Earth have been found at the same rate for thousands of years. For this too, the Orbit thesis Scientists take shelter under the Big Bang and the Newton's law of Motion under no-resistance situations. While the speed at which the Earth orbits - around 100,000 km per hour, which can not be without frictional heat and resistance. It seems the Earth gets Energy from somewhere for maintaing the rates of the two motions.
With all these points, the Author of this post argues that the Big Bang theory is not yet proved and established, hence it is merely an assumption. Taking support of an assumption is no scientific wisdom.
Sun, Earth, Orbit, Motion